Perbandingan Teknik Backcalculation untuk Perkerasan Bandar Udara Berdasarkan Data Uji Heavy Weight Deflectometer (Studi Kasus: Bandar Udara Rendani Manokwari)
Agus Erwansyah, Ir. Latif Budi Suparma, M.Sc., Ph.D. ; Ir. Taqia Rahman, S.T., M.Sc., Ph.D. ; Ir. Suprapto Siswosukarto, Ph.D., IPM.
2025 | Tesis | S2 Mag. S. & T.Transportasi
Bandar Udara Rendani di Manokwari memiliki
peran strategis dalam mendukung konektivitas wilayah. Meningkatnya aktivitas
penerbangan menuntut evaluasi kondisi perkerasan yang andal tanpa merusak
struktur, salah satunya melalui uji Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD).
Penelitian ini membandingkan performa tiga software backcalculation
yaitu: ELMOD 6, BAKFAA, dan PCASE 7.0.7 dalam memperkirakan modulus elastisitas
lapisan perkerasan berdasarkan data HWD.
Metode penelitian meliputi
pengolahan data defleksi dari pengujian Heavy Weight Deflectometer (HWD)
untuk menilai akurasi, stabilitas hasil, dan kesesuaian terhadap standar FAA.
Analisis dilakukan terhadap tiga software backcalculation ELMOD 6,
BAKFAA, dan PCASE 7.0.7 berdasarkan kemampuan dalam menghasilkan nilai modulus
yang mendekati seed moduli, respons terhadap variasi konfigurasi lapisan
dan asumsi CBR tanah dasar, serta nilai residual error (RMSE). Selain
itu, perbandingan metode perhitungan dan kinerja masing-masing software
dianalisis lebih lanjut melalui penilaian multi-kriteria untuk menentukan
keunggulan relatif dari ketiganya.
Hasil analisis backcalculation terhadap data defleksi HWD di Bandara Rendani menunjukkan bahwa ELMOD 6 menghasilkan nilai modulus elastisitas yang relatif mendekati seed moduli dan sesuai dengan standar FAA. ELMOD 6 juga mencatat nilai RMSE terendah dan konsistensi hasil yang tinggi. PCASE 7.0.7 menunjukkan performa cukup stabil, sementara BAKFAA menghasilkan nilai yang cenderung tidak konsisten. Perbedaan kinerja ini dipengaruhi oleh algoritma, sensitivitas terhadap input, dan kemampuan pemodelan masing-masing software. Berdasarkan penilaian multi-kriteria, ELMOD 6 memperoleh skor tertinggi (3,8), diikuti PCASE 7.0.7 (3,2) dan BAKFAA (2,2), sehingga ELMOD 6 direkomendasikan sebagai software yang andal untuk analisis backcalculation perkerasan bandar udara.
Rendani Airport in Manokwari
holds a strategic role in supporting regional connectivity. The increasing
volume of air traffic requires a reliable evaluation of pavement conditions
without damaging the structure, one of which can be conducted through Heavy
Weight Deflectometer (HWD) testing. This study compares the performance of
three backcalculation software programs ELMOD 6, BAKFAA, and PCASE 7.0.7 in
estimating the elastic modulus of pavement layers based on HWD data.
The research method involves
processing deflection data from HWD testing to assess accuracy, result
stability, and compliance with FAA standards. The three software programs were
analyzed based on their ability to produce modulus values close to the seed
moduli, their response to variations in layer configuration and subgrade CBR
assumptions, and their residual error (RMSE) values. Furthermore, differences
in computational methods and performance were evaluated using multi-criteria
assessment to determine the relative strengths of each software.
The results of the backcalculation analysis based on HWD deflection data at Rendani Airport indicate that ELMOD 6 produces elastic modulus values that are relatively close to the seed moduli and comply with FAA standards. ELMOD 6 also recorded the lowest RMSE value and demonstrated high consistency in its results. PCASE 7.0.7 showed relatively stable performance, while BAKFAA yielded values that tended to be inconsistent. These performance differences are influenced by each software’s algorithm, sensitivity to input parameters, and modeling capabilities. Based on a multi-criteria assessment, ELMOD 6 achieved the highest score (3.8), followed by PCASE 7.0.7 (3.2) and BAKFAA (2.2). Therefore, ELMOD 6 is recommended as a reliable software for airport pavement backcalculation analysis.
Kata Kunci : heavy weight deflectometer, backcalculation, ELMOD 6, BAKFAA, PCASE 7.0.7.