ANALISIS KOMERSIALISASI USAHATANI DAN DISTRIBUSI PENDAPATAN RUMAH TANGGA TANI DI KABUPATEN SLEMAN

DWI NIRMALASARI PANGESTUTI, Dr. JANGKUNG HANDOYO MULYO, M.Ec ; Prof. Dr. Ir. MASYHURI

2014 | Skripsi | SOS.EK. PERTANIAN (AGROBISNIS)

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat komersialisasi usahatani, faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi komersialisasi usahatani, kontribusi pendapatan usahatani terhadap pendapatan rumah tangga tani, distribusi pendapatan rumah tangga tani, tingkat kemiskinan dan kesejahteraan rumah tangga tani di Kabupaten Sleman. Metode dasar dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif analisis. Penentuan sampel dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode acak sederhana yaitu 40 sampel rumah tangga petani di Kabupaten Sleman. Untuk menganalisis tingkat komersialisasi usahatani digunakan analisis kuantitatif, sedangkan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi komersialisasi usahatani digunakan metode regresi linier berganda. Untuk menganalisis kontribusi pendapatan digunakan analisis kuantitatif persentase kontribusi pendapatan. Untuk menganalisis distribusi pendapatan digunakan analisis kuantitatif koefisien gini dan kurva Lorenz, sedangkan untuk menganalisis tingkat kemiskinan dan kesejahteraan digunakan indikator kemiskinan dan indikator kesejahteraan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tingkat komersialisasi usahatani di Kabupaten Sleman sebesar 83,42%. Faktor yang berpengaruh secara positif terhadap komersialisasi usahatani di Kabupaten Sleman adalah luas lahan, sedangkan faktor yang berpengaruh secara negatif adalah jumlah anggota keluarga bekerja. Pendapatan usahatani memberikan kontribusi sebesar 34,66% terhadap pendapatan total rumah tangga tani. Distribusi pendapatan rumah tangga tani di Kabupaten Sleman memiliki ketimpangan yang tinggi dengan nilai koefisien gini sebesar 0,515. Menurut kriteria kemiskinan Sajogyo, BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik) Kabupaten Sleman Tahun 2013, Asian Development Bank (ADB) dan Bank Dunia (World Bank) rumah tangga tani di Kabupaten Sleman tidak miskin atau jika dianalisis dengan kriteria Good Service Ratio (GSR) termasuk dalam kategori sejahtera.

This research aimed to know the level of agriculture commercialization, the factors that influence agriculture commercialization, farming income contribution to the total income of farmer's household, distribution of farmer's income, the poverty and welfare level of farmer's household in Sleman district. The primary method used was descriptive analysis method. Sampling was done by using simple random method to get 40 samples of farmer household in the Sleman district. To analyze the level of agriculture commercialization, quantitative analysis was used. To analyze the factors that influence agriculture commercialization, the multiple regression analysis was used. Quantitative analysis was used to analyze the percentage of income contribution. Quantitative analysis of Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve were used to analyze the income contribution. Meanwhile, to analyze the poverty and welfare level, the indicators of poverty and welfare were used. The results showed that the level of agriculture commercialization was 83,42%. Factor that positively affected the agriculture commercialization in Sleman district was the land area, while the factor that negatively affected the agriculture commercialization was the number of employed family members. The farming income contributed by 34,66% to the total income of farmer's household. Income distribution of the farmer's household in Sleman had high inequality, indicated by the Gini coefficient value of 0,515. According to the poverty criteria of Sajogyo, the BPS (Central Bureau of Statistics) of Sleman district in 2013, Asian Development Bank (ADB) and World Bank, the farmer's household in Sleman district were classified as not poor. In addition, based on the Good Service Ratio (GSR) standard, the farmer's household were categorized as prosperous.

Kata Kunci : Komersialisasi, kontribusi, distribusi pendapatan, kemiskinan, kesejahteraan/Commercialization, contribution, income distribution, poverty, welfare