PERBANDINGAN KUALITAS CITRA HARD COPY DENGAN HASIL DIGITIZER DAN KAMERA SAKU PADA FOTO POLOS DADA KASUS TUBERKULOSIS DI BAGIAN RADIOLOGI RSUP DR. SARDJITO
GALUH KARTIKA DEWI, Dr. dr. Lina Choridah, Sp.Rad(K)
2014 | Skripsi | PENDIDIKAN DOKTERLatar Belakang : Salah satu penunjang diagnosis tuberkulosis adalah foto polos dada. Tetapi dengan keadaan geografis Indonesia dan jumlah spesialis radiologi yang tidak memadai, maka muncul gagasan penggunaan teleradiologi. Teleradiologi ini harus didukung oleh hasil pencitraan yang baik. Tujuan : Mengetahui perbedaan kualitas citra dan kesesuaian diagnosis antara hard copy dengan soft copy hasil digitizer dan kamera saku pada foto polos dada kasus tuberkulosis. Metode dan Material : Penelitian observational pada 30 foto polos dada tuberkulosis. Data digital work station diprint menghasilkan hard copy, kemudian didigitalisasi menggunakan digitizer dan kamera saku. Kualitas citra hard copy dibandingkan dengan kualitas citra soft copy hasil digitalisasi digitizer dan kamera saku. Hasil :Perbandingan kualitas citra antara kelompok hard copy dengan digitizer p=1.000, perbandingan kualitas citra antara kelompok hard copy dengan kamera saku p=0.000, perbandingan kesesuaian diagnosis antara hard copy dengan digitizer p=1.000, dan perbandingan kesesuaian diagnosis antara hard copy dengan kamera saku p=1.000. Kesimpulan : Tidak ada perbedaan kualitas citra yang bermakna antara hard copy dengan soft copy hasil digitizer (p>0.05), sedangkan hard copy memiliki kualitas citra yang lebih baik dibandingkan soft copy hasil kamera saku (p<0.05). Pada penilaian kesesuaian diagnosis antara hard copy dengan soft copy hasil digitizer maupun soft copy hasil kamera saku tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna secara statistik (p>0.05).
Background : One of supporting examination on tuberculosis is chest X-ray and Indonesia need teleradiology to resolve our problem about geographic conditions and too few radiologists. But teleradiology has to be supported by good imaging quality. Objective : To know about image quality differences and diagnostic suitability between hard copy and soft copy digitized by digitizer and pocket camera on chest X-ray for diagnosing tuberculosis Method dan Material : Observational study on 30 Chest X-ray with tuberculosis sign. Data from work station is printed to hard copy, and digitized by digitizer and pocket camera. Compare the image quality of hard copy and soft copy digitized by digitizer and pocket camera. Results :Comparison of image quality between hard copy and digitizer is p=1.000, Comparison of image quality between hard copy and pocket camera is p=0.000, Comparison of diagnostic suitability between hard copy and digitizer is p=1.000, and Comparison of diagnostic suitability between hard copy and pocket camera is p=1.000. Conclusion :There is no significant difference in image quality between hard copy and soft copy by digitizer (p>0.05), although hard copy has a better image quality than soft copy by pocket camera (p<0.05). There is no significant difference in diagnostic suitability between hard copy and soft copy by digitizer and pocket camera (p>0.05).
Kata Kunci : Tuberkulosis, Hard copy, Soft copy, Digitizer, Kamera Saku, Teleradiologi