SANKSI ADMINISTRATIF TERHADAP NOTARIS YANG MELAKUKAN PELANGGARAN JABATAN DAN NOTARIS YANG MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA YANG PUTUSANNYA TELAH MEMPEROLEH KEKUATAN HUKUM TETAP DI KABUPATEN BANTUL

Andiko Trio Aji, Dwi Haryati, S.H., M.H.,

2012 | Tesis | S2 Magister Kenotariatan

This study aims to determine the implementation of administrative sanctions for violating the Notary position Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a UUJN and aims to determine the implementation of sanctions against the notary who perform a criminal act periods years 2007-2009 and the decision has gained legal force remain in the district of Bantul. The nature of this research is empirical legal research. Empirical legal research is a study based on secondary data as the data first, followed by a primary data or field data. Tools or methods of data collection in this research are literature study in order to obtain data on library research and interviews conducted with respondents asked questions and resources to obtain data on the research field. The results were analyzed qualitatively and presented with descriptive. The results of this study show, first implementation of administrative sanctions for violating the Notary Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a UUJN in Bantul District in accordance with UUJN, implementation of public reporting to the MPD, after summoning and examination conducted by the MPD and the evidence of malfeasance in office, MPD reported to MPW following the proposal a violation of sanctions or recommendations, of formally reporting party may report to MPW. MPW did to call and examination; give a written warning penalty decision in accordance with Article 73 paragraph 1 letter e UUJN with consideration: UUJN, PermenHukHam M. 02. PR. 08. 10 In 2004, the Code Notary. Both the implementation of sanctions against the Notary of committing criminal offenses periods years 2007-2009 and the decision has gained legal force remain in Bantul district under the provisions of Article 13 UUJN implementation by the Minister upon the report of the MPD, MPW and MPP have not fully by the rules implementation is PermenHukHam: M.01.-HT.03.01 Year 2006 Article 33, because when a defendant does not have layoffs.

This study aims to determine the implementation of administrative sanctions for violating the Notary position Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a UUJN and aims to determine the implementation of sanctions against the notary who perform a criminal act periods years 2007-2009 and the decision has gained legal force remain in the district of Bantul. The nature of this research is empirical legal research. Empirical legal research is a study based on secondary data as the data first, followed by a primary data or field data. Tools or methods of data collection in this research are literature study in order to obtain data on library research and interviews conducted with respondents asked questions and resources to obtain data on the research field. The results were analyzed qualitatively and presented with descriptive. The results of this study show, first implementation of administrative sanctions for violating the Notary Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a UUJN in Bantul District in accordance with UUJN, implementation of public reporting to the MPD, after summoning and examination conducted by the MPD and the evidence of malfeasance in office, MPD reported to MPW following the proposal a violation of sanctions or recommendations, of formally reporting party may report to MPW. MPW did to call and examination; give a written warning penalty decision in accordance with Article 73 paragraph 1 letter e UUJN with consideration: UUJN, PermenHukHam M. 02. PR. 08. 10 In 2004, the Code Notary. Both the implementation of sanctions against the Notary of committing criminal offenses periods years 2007-2009 and the decision has gained legal force remain in Bantul district under the provisions of Article 13 UUJN implementation by the Minister upon the report of the MPD, MPW and MPP have not fully by the rules implementation is PermenHukHam: M.01.-HT.03.01 Year 2006 Article 33, because when a defendant does not have layoffs.

Kata Kunci : Sanksi Administratif, Pelanggaran, Pidana