Tinjauan yuridis atas kesenjangan interpretasi konsep sepakat dalam perjanjian distribusi obat

BETSAIDA, Prof. Dr. Nindyo Pramono, S.H., .S

2010 | Tesis | S2 Magister Hukum

Penelitian ini secara khusus bertujuan untuk dapat mengetahui kronologis hubungan hukum dan kronologis sengketa di antara PT. BI dan PT. PDT serta interpretasi para pihak mengenai konsep sepakat berdasarkan segenap riwayat korespondensi dalam rangka memperpanjang Perjanjian Distribusi dan juga untuk mengetahui apakah hasil negosiasi yang tidak secara eksplisit dituangkan dalam riwayat korespondensi dapat dinyatakan sebagai konsep sepakat secara yuridis. Penelitian ini bersifat yuridis normatif yaitu secara khusus meneliti mengenai asas-asas hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia disertai perbandingan hukum mengenai konsep sepakat yang berlaku di Indonesia yang menganut sistem hukum Eropa Kontinental dengan sistem hukum Anglo Saxon. Dalam pelaksanaannya, tertuju pada penelitian kepustakaan yang berarti banyak melakukan pengkajian atas data sekunder yang bersumber pada bahan-bahan hukum primer, sekunder dan tersier. Data sekunder ini diperoleh dari penelitian kepustakaan yang dilakukan oleh penulis dan dari Firma Hukum AriyantoArnaldo selaku Konsultan PT. PDT yang memberikan berkas perkara berupa perjanjian distribusi dan korespondensi antara PT. PDT dan PT. BI. Setelah penelitian dijalankan, penulis mendapatkan hasil bahwa memang benar terdapat kesenjangan interpretasi antara PT. PDT dan PT. BI. Interpretasi PT. PDT adalah pada saat para pihak yang terlibat dalam perjanjian telah mencapai titik temu antara penawaran dan penerimaan. Titik temu dalam hal ini adalah pada saat PT. PDT menerima kontra-kontra penawaran yang diajukan oleh PT. BI melalui Surat PT. PDT Ref.No.: 033/HSM-LTR/VI/2007 tertanggal 15 Juni 2007. Sebaliknya, PT. BI terindikasi menafsirkan saat terjadinya Kata Sepakat adalah pada saat ditandatanganinya Perjanjian Distribusi secara formal oleh kedua belah pihak berdasarkan Surat II tertanggal 13 Juni 2007, 3 Juli 2007, 4 Juli 2007 dan 5 Juli 2007. Hasil kedua yang Penulis dapatkan dari penelitian ini adalah bahwa kesepakatan yang terjadi dalam proses negosiasi meskipun hasilnya tidak secara eksplisit dituangkan dalam dokumen korespondensi jelas telah memenuhi arti atau makna konsep sepakat secara yuridis.

This research have purposes to get know deeply about chronological legal relation and legal dispute between PT. BI and PT. PDT as well as the interpretation made by each parties concerning the Agreed Concept based on all the stories of correspondence, in order to extend the Distribution Agreement and also to get know whether the results of negosiations that not explicit was stated in the story of correspondence could be stated as the Agreed Concept in juridical point of view. This research was juridical normative that is specially researched concerning legal principles that were valid in Indonesia and its was accompanied by giving the legal comparison concerning the agreed concept that was valid in Indonesia as a country who followed the European Kontinental legal system with the Anglo Saxon legal system. In the implementation, this research was directed to the significant bibliography research which have carried out investigation on the secondary data. This secondary data was received from the bibliography research and AriyantoArnaldo Law Firm as the PT. PDT’s Consultant that gave the dossier took the form of the distribution agreement and correspondence between PT. PDT and PT. BI. After the research was undertaken, the writer got results that there was differing interpretation between PT. PDT and PT. BI. PT. PDT’s interpretation was at the time of the sides that were involved in the agreement reaching the meeting point between offering and acceptance. The meeting point in this case was at the time PT. PDT accepted contra-contra offering that was put forward by PT. BI through the Letter of PT. PDT Ref.No. : 033/HSM-LTR/VI/2007 dated June 15th, 2007. On the other hand, PT. BI was indicated to interprete the occurrence of the Agreement was when the Distribusi Agreement formally being signed by the sides which was indicated based on the Letter II dated June 13th, 2007, on July 3rd, 2007, on July 4th , 2007 and on July 5th, 2007. The second results is the reached of agreement that happened in the process of negotiations despite results that its not explicit poured in the clear correspondence document has fullfilled the meaning of the agreed concept in juridical point of view.

Kata Kunci : Sepakat,Permintaan,Penawaran,Agreed, Offering, Acceptance