t table, maka dapat dikatakan program MBS telah berhasil meningkatkan mutu Pembelajaran. Dan berdasakan uji korelasi antara variable dependen mutu Pembelajaran dengan variabel independent Manajemen, PAKEM dan PSM memperoleh hasil korelasi spearman’s rho berturut-turut adalah 0,822 dan 0,445 serta 0,824 pada taraf signifikansi 0.01 dimana harga r table untuk N=15 adalah 0,641 dan dengan demikian r hitung > r table, maka untuk Manajemen dan PSM berpengaruh terhadap keberhasilan MBS. Sedangkan PAKEM r hitung < r table, maka PAKEM dapat di katakan kurang pengaruh terhadap peningkatan mutu Program MBS di Papua tahun 2003. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disarankan untuk dapat melanjutkan program tersebut pada tingkat yang lebih luas secara lebih intensif, mengkaji kendala kendala lebih lanjut untuk memperoleh Keberhasilan yang lebih besar dalam upaya meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran di Papua. Perlu Peningkatan dan Penguatan pada variable PAKEM sehingga dapat meningkatkan mutu pendidikan secara signifikan. Diperlukan dana APBD yang lebih besar untuk mereplikasi program yang sebelumnya membuat skala prioritas target grup. Perlu koordinasi yang intensif antara Dinas Pendidikan Papua dan BP3D, pengelola MBS di Unicef Papua, membentuk Satgas MBS Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota, peningkatan peran Dewan Pendidikan, Komite Sekolah, Dunia Pendidikan maupun Dunia Usaha. Perlu pemasyarakatan Program MBS di Papua dengan jalan sosialisasi, magang, advokasi, pendampingan PAKEM dan Pelatihan TOT baik tingkat Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota, tingkat gugus dan sekolah. The research on Evaluation of the School-Based Management Program in Papua Province (SBM Program conducted by UNICEF with UNESCO and the Regional Government of Papua in 2003) was aimed: 1) to reveal the successful SBM program effectiveness level in Papua Province, 2) to know the factors influencing the success of the MBS Program in Papua. The approach of this research used combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative approach was to process data obtained from the questionnaires distributed to 15 schools, which were taken as sample from three kabupatens (districts) being target of the 2003 SBM program in Papua Province. The principals of the schools completed the questionnaires. Then, the data were processed using MS Excel program for Windows to get the percentage measurement. Sample was taken using stratification of probability random sampling. The dependent variable was the success of SBM after the application of program (output 2004) (Y) and the independent variables were the School Management (X1), PAKEM (X2), and PSM (X3). To evaluate the significance of the SBM program, it used t-test on SPSS program and inter-variable effect used Correlation test. While, qualitative approach came from in-depth interview to the stockholders, namely the SBM manager in UNICEF Papua, the teachers, the principals, the School Committees, the School Boards, educational experts, SBM manager at kabupaten (district) level, and the Head of P & P Service in Papua Province. Implicitly, the qualitative data was used to support the quantitative ones at making effective the research analysis. The results of this research showed the output comparison before and after the implementation of the program (output 2004) using t-test at the significance level of 95%. The t-test resulted in t count = 4.621 > t table = 2.13 indicating that SBM program had succeeded in improving the learning quality. While, based on the correlation test between the dependent variable of the Learning Quality with the independent variables of Management, PAKEM, and PSM resulted in spaerman’s rho correlation values of 0.822, 0.445, and 0.824, respectively on the significance level of 0.01, in which the r table value for N = 15 was 0.641. Therefore, r count > r table meant that Management and PSM had effect on the successful SBM. However, the PAKEM indicated r count < r table, so that meant PAKEM had less effect on the quality improvement of SBM program in Papua in 2003. From the research it was also known the success level of the School Management = 79.11 persen, PAKEM = 63 persen and PSM = 72.80persen. Based on these results, the writer suggested the concerned parties to continue the program more intensively at wider level and to investigate the problems further in order to achieve greater success at their efforts to improve the learning quality in Papua. They were required to improve and to strengthen the PAKEM variable in order to improve the quality of education significantly. The program required them to make targeted group scale of priority first and greater APBD funds to replicate it. An intensive coordination was required for the Education Service of Papua and BP3D with the SBM managers of UNICEF Papua. It was also required to set up SBM task forces at Province as well as kabupaten levels, to promote the participation of the School Boards, the School Committee, and Educational as well as Business world. SBM program should be socialized to public by means of socialization, apprentice, advocacy, PAKEM assistance and TOT at provincial, levels as well as at cluster and school levels"> t table, maka dapat dikatakan program MBS telah berhasil meningkatkan mutu Pembelajaran. Dan berdasakan uji korelasi antara variable dependen mutu Pembelajaran dengan variabel independent Manajemen, PAKEM dan PSM memperoleh hasil korelasi spearman’s rho berturut-turut adalah 0,822 dan 0,445 serta 0,824 pada taraf signifikansi 0.01 dimana harga r table untuk N=15 adalah 0,641 dan dengan demikian r hitung > r table, maka untuk Manajemen dan PSM berpengaruh terhadap keberhasilan MBS. Sedangkan PAKEM r hitung < r table, maka PAKEM dapat di katakan kurang pengaruh terhadap peningkatan mutu Program MBS di Papua tahun 2003. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disarankan untuk dapat melanjutkan program tersebut pada tingkat yang lebih luas secara lebih intensif, mengkaji kendala kendala lebih lanjut untuk memperoleh Keberhasilan yang lebih besar dalam upaya meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran di Papua. Perlu Peningkatan dan Penguatan pada variable PAKEM sehingga dapat meningkatkan mutu pendidikan secara signifikan. Diperlukan dana APBD yang lebih besar untuk mereplikasi program yang sebelumnya membuat skala prioritas target grup. Perlu koordinasi yang intensif antara Dinas Pendidikan Papua dan BP3D, pengelola MBS di Unicef Papua, membentuk Satgas MBS Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota, peningkatan peran Dewan Pendidikan, Komite Sekolah, Dunia Pendidikan maupun Dunia Usaha. Perlu pemasyarakatan Program MBS di Papua dengan jalan sosialisasi, magang, advokasi, pendampingan PAKEM dan Pelatihan TOT baik tingkat Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota, tingkat gugus dan sekolah. The research on Evaluation of the School-Based Management Program in Papua Province (SBM Program conducted by UNICEF with UNESCO and the Regional Government of Papua in 2003) was aimed: 1) to reveal the successful SBM program effectiveness level in Papua Province, 2) to know the factors influencing the success of the MBS Program in Papua. The approach of this research used combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative approach was to process data obtained from the questionnaires distributed to 15 schools, which were taken as sample from three kabupatens (districts) being target of the 2003 SBM program in Papua Province. The principals of the schools completed the questionnaires. Then, the data were processed using MS Excel program for Windows to get the percentage measurement. Sample was taken using stratification of probability random sampling. The dependent variable was the success of SBM after the application of program (output 2004) (Y) and the independent variables were the School Management (X1), PAKEM (X2), and PSM (X3). To evaluate the significance of the SBM program, it used t-test on SPSS program and inter-variable effect used Correlation test. While, qualitative approach came from in-depth interview to the stockholders, namely the SBM manager in UNICEF Papua, the teachers, the principals, the School Committees, the School Boards, educational experts, SBM manager at kabupaten (district) level, and the Head of P & P Service in Papua Province. Implicitly, the qualitative data was used to support the quantitative ones at making effective the research analysis. The results of this research showed the output comparison before and after the implementation of the program (output 2004) using t-test at the significance level of 95%. The t-test resulted in t count = 4.621 > t table = 2.13 indicating that SBM program had succeeded in improving the learning quality. While, based on the correlation test between the dependent variable of the Learning Quality with the independent variables of Management, PAKEM, and PSM resulted in spaerman’s rho correlation values of 0.822, 0.445, and 0.824, respectively on the significance level of 0.01, in which the r table value for N = 15 was 0.641. Therefore, r count > r table meant that Management and PSM had effect on the successful SBM. However, the PAKEM indicated r count < r table, so that meant PAKEM had less effect on the quality improvement of SBM program in Papua in 2003. From the research it was also known the success level of the School Management = 79.11 persen, PAKEM = 63 persen and PSM = 72.80persen. Based on these results, the writer suggested the concerned parties to continue the program more intensively at wider level and to investigate the problems further in order to achieve greater success at their efforts to improve the learning quality in Papua. They were required to improve and to strengthen the PAKEM variable in order to improve the quality of education significantly. The program required them to make targeted group scale of priority first and greater APBD funds to replicate it. An intensive coordination was required for the Education Service of Papua and BP3D with the SBM managers of UNICEF Papua. It was also required to set up SBM task forces at Province as well as kabupaten levels, to promote the participation of the School Boards, the School Committee, and Educational as well as Business world. SBM program should be socialized to public by means of socialization, apprentice, advocacy, PAKEM assistance and TOT at provincial, levels as well as at cluster and school levels">
Studi evaluasi Program Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah (MBS) di provinsi Papua :: Program MBS yang dilaksanakan oleh UNICEF bersama UNESCO dan Pemda Papua tahun 2003/2004
NURHADI, Dr. Muhadjir Darwin
2005 | Tesis | Magister Administrasi PublikPenelitian tentang Evaluasi Program Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah Di Propinsi Papua (Program MBS yang dilaksanakan oleh Unicef bersama Unesco dan Pemda Papua tahun 2003) ini bertujuan 1). Mengungkapkan tingkat efektifitas keberhasilan program MBS di Propinsi Papua. 2). Mengetahui faktor-faktor apa saja yang dapat mempengaruhi keberhasilan Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah (MBS) di Papua. Pendekatan penelitian ini adalah kombinasi metode kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Pendekatan kuantitatif digunakan untuk mengolah data yang berasal dari penyebaran angket dengan mengambil sample sebanyak 15 sekolah yang diisi oleh kepala sekolah dari 3 Kabupaten yang mendapat program Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah (MBS) "School Based Management" tahun 2003 di Provinsi Papua. Data ini diolah dengan bantuan MS. Excel, untuk memperoleh besarnya prosentasi. Sample diambil secara stratifikasi probability area random sampling. Sebagai variabel dependen adalah Keberhasilan MBS sesudah program (output 2004)(Y) dan sebagai variabel independent adalah Manajemen sekolah (X1), PAKEM (X2), dan PSM (X3). Untuk menguji kebermaknaan program MBS digunakan uji t pada program SPSS dan pengaruh antar variabel mengunakan Uji Korelasi. Sedangkan pendekatan kualitatif diperoleh dari wawancara secara mendalam kepada stakeholder yaitu, Pengelola MBS di unicef Papua, Para Guru, Kepala sekolah, Komite sekolah, Dewan sekolah, pakar pendidikan, Pengelola MBS Provinsi, Kepala dinas P dan P Provinsi Papua. Secara inplisit data kualitatif dipakai sebagai penguatan data kuatitatif untuk mempertajam analisis penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukan perbandingan output setelah program berlangsung (ouput 2004) dengan sebelum program berlangsung, dengan mengunakan uji t pada taraf signifikansi 95% ternyata t hitung = 4.621 dan t table = 2,13, sehingga t hitung > t table, maka dapat dikatakan program MBS telah berhasil meningkatkan mutu Pembelajaran. Dan berdasakan uji korelasi antara variable dependen mutu Pembelajaran dengan variabel independent Manajemen, PAKEM dan PSM memperoleh hasil korelasi spearman’s rho berturut-turut adalah 0,822 dan 0,445 serta 0,824 pada taraf signifikansi 0.01 dimana harga r table untuk N=15 adalah 0,641 dan dengan demikian r hitung > r table, maka untuk Manajemen dan PSM berpengaruh terhadap keberhasilan MBS. Sedangkan PAKEM r hitung < r table, maka PAKEM dapat di katakan kurang pengaruh terhadap peningkatan mutu Program MBS di Papua tahun 2003. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian disarankan untuk dapat melanjutkan program tersebut pada tingkat yang lebih luas secara lebih intensif, mengkaji kendala kendala lebih lanjut untuk memperoleh Keberhasilan yang lebih besar dalam upaya meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran di Papua. Perlu Peningkatan dan Penguatan pada variable PAKEM sehingga dapat meningkatkan mutu pendidikan secara signifikan. Diperlukan dana APBD yang lebih besar untuk mereplikasi program yang sebelumnya membuat skala prioritas target grup. Perlu koordinasi yang intensif antara Dinas Pendidikan Papua dan BP3D, pengelola MBS di Unicef Papua, membentuk Satgas MBS Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota, peningkatan peran Dewan Pendidikan, Komite Sekolah, Dunia Pendidikan maupun Dunia Usaha. Perlu pemasyarakatan Program MBS di Papua dengan jalan sosialisasi, magang, advokasi, pendampingan PAKEM dan Pelatihan TOT baik tingkat Provinsi, Kabupaten/Kota, tingkat gugus dan sekolah.
The research on Evaluation of the School-Based Management Program in Papua Province (SBM Program conducted by UNICEF with UNESCO and the Regional Government of Papua in 2003) was aimed: 1) to reveal the successful SBM program effectiveness level in Papua Province, 2) to know the factors influencing the success of the MBS Program in Papua. The approach of this research used combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. The quantitative approach was to process data obtained from the questionnaires distributed to 15 schools, which were taken as sample from three kabupatens (districts) being target of the 2003 SBM program in Papua Province. The principals of the schools completed the questionnaires. Then, the data were processed using MS Excel program for Windows to get the percentage measurement. Sample was taken using stratification of probability random sampling. The dependent variable was the success of SBM after the application of program (output 2004) (Y) and the independent variables were the School Management (X1), PAKEM (X2), and PSM (X3). To evaluate the significance of the SBM program, it used t-test on SPSS program and inter-variable effect used Correlation test. While, qualitative approach came from in-depth interview to the stockholders, namely the SBM manager in UNICEF Papua, the teachers, the principals, the School Committees, the School Boards, educational experts, SBM manager at kabupaten (district) level, and the Head of P & P Service in Papua Province. Implicitly, the qualitative data was used to support the quantitative ones at making effective the research analysis. The results of this research showed the output comparison before and after the implementation of the program (output 2004) using t-test at the significance level of 95%. The t-test resulted in t count = 4.621 > t table = 2.13 indicating that SBM program had succeeded in improving the learning quality. While, based on the correlation test between the dependent variable of the Learning Quality with the independent variables of Management, PAKEM, and PSM resulted in spaerman’s rho correlation values of 0.822, 0.445, and 0.824, respectively on the significance level of 0.01, in which the r table value for N = 15 was 0.641. Therefore, r count > r table meant that Management and PSM had effect on the successful SBM. However, the PAKEM indicated r count < r table, so that meant PAKEM had less effect on the quality improvement of SBM program in Papua in 2003. From the research it was also known the success level of the School Management = 79.11 persen, PAKEM = 63 persen and PSM = 72.80persen. Based on these results, the writer suggested the concerned parties to continue the program more intensively at wider level and to investigate the problems further in order to achieve greater success at their efforts to improve the learning quality in Papua. They were required to improve and to strengthen the PAKEM variable in order to improve the quality of education significantly. The program required them to make targeted group scale of priority first and greater APBD funds to replicate it. An intensive coordination was required for the Education Service of Papua and BP3D with the SBM managers of UNICEF Papua. It was also required to set up SBM task forces at Province as well as kabupaten levels, to promote the participation of the School Boards, the School Committee, and Educational as well as Business world. SBM program should be socialized to public by means of socialization, apprentice, advocacy, PAKEM assistance and TOT at provincial, levels as well as at cluster and school levels
Kata Kunci : Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah,Propinsi Papua, School-Based Management