PELAKSANAAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN MELALUI DISKRESI LPSK DALAM MEMBERIKAN DANA BANTUAN KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN SEKSUAL DITINJAU DARI ASPEK KEMANFAATAN
Ery Kurnia, Hendry Julian Noor
2026 | Tesis | S2 ILMU HUKUM JAKARTA
Penelitian
ini menggunakan metode normatif. Cara perolehan data sekunder melalui bahan
hukum primer, bahan hukum sekunder, dan bahan hukum tersier. Metode pendekatan
yaitu pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan kasus, pendekatan peraturan
perundang-undangan. Analisis data menggunakan metode kualitatif, disajikan
secara deskriptif analitis, dan metode penarikan kesimpulan dilakukan secara
deduktif.
Penelitian
ini memiliki 2 (dua) kesimpulan: Pertama, LPSK memiliki
kewenangan untuk melaksanakan putusan pengadilan pemberian DBK, berdasarkan
kewenangannya yang diperoleh dari atribusi, menggunakan metode penafisiran
hukum sistematis. Kedua, dalam pelaksanaan putusan pengadilan,
LPSK dapat menerbitkan diskresi untuk mengatasi legal gap dalam mencapai
kemanfaatan, diskresi LPSK terbit melalui Keputusan LPSK pemulihan korban melalui
DBK sesuai putusan pengadilan. Penerbitan diskresi tersebut
tetap memperhatikan UU Administrasi Pemerintahan sehingga tidak melanggar
ketentuan yang berlaku. Walaupun terdapat beberapa hambatan dalam
pelaksanaannya, namun tetap tidak menggugurkan kewajiban LPSK untuk
melaksanakan pemberian DBK sebelum PP DBK terbit berdasarkan putusan
pengadilan.
This
study aims to analyze the legal arrangements of the authority of the Witness
and Victim Protection Institution (LPSK) in implementing court decisions that
have permanent legal force in the provision of the Victim Assistance Fund for
Sexual Violence (DBK) before Government Regulation Number 29 of 2025 concerning
the Victim Assistance Fund (PP DBK) is issued using discretion reviewed from
the aspect of legal utility. The problems studied include the basis of LPSK's
discretionary authority, the implementation of court decisions regarding
underpayment restitution carried out through DBK, and the extent to which the
discretion produces benefits for victims of sexual violence crimes (TPKS
victims).
This
study uses a normative method. How to obtain secondary data through primary
legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The
approach method is a conceptual approach, a case approach, and a legislative
approach. Data analysis uses qualitative methods, presented in an analytical
descriptive manner, and the method of drawing conclusions is carried out
deductively.
This
study has two
conclusions: First, LPSK has the authority to implement court decisions
regarding the granting of DBK, because in court decisions there is LPSK's
authority obtained through attribution, using systematic legal affirmation
methods. Second, in the implementation of the court decision, LPSK can issue
discretion according to its authority to fill the legal void in achieving legal
objectives in terms of benefit, LPSK discretion is issued through LPSK Decree
so that TPKS victims can obtain recovery through DBK in accordance with court
decisions. The issuance of the discretion still pays attention to the
Government Administration Law so that it does not violate the applicable
provisions. Although there are several obstacles in its implementation, it
still does not abort LPSK's obligation to carry out the provision of DBK before
the PP DBK is issued based on a court decision.
Kata Kunci : Diskresi LPSK, Pelaksanaan Putusan Pengadilan, Dana Bantuan Korban, Kekerasan Seksual, Kemanfaatan Hukum
