Laporkan Masalah

Analisis Strategi Bersaing PT Kereta Api Logistik dalam Persaingan Bisnis di Industri Logistik Nasional

RICO YUDHIANTO, Prof. Nurul Indarti, Sivilokonom., Cand.Merc., PhD.,

2026 | Tesis | S2 MANAJEMEN (MM) JAKARTA

Penelitian ini dilakukan di PT Kereta Api Logistik, perusahaan logistik berbasis rel dalam ekosistem KAI Group. Penelitian ini membahas strategi bersaing perusahaan dalam industri angkutan logistik nasional setelah realisasi pendapatan dan volume angkutan tahun 2024 belum mencapai target Rencana Kerja dan Anggaran Perusahaan (RKAP). Kondisi tersebut dipengaruhi oleh dominasi angkutan jalan, perkembangan pemain logistik digital, perubahan kebutuhan pelanggan, pengalihan bongkar muat ke kompetitor, penurunan permintaan beberapa komoditas, kenaikan tarif sewa angkutan kereta api, keterbatasan jaringan layanan, serta pemanfaatan sarana yang belum optimal.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi peluang dan ancaman eksternal serta kekuatan dan kelemahan internal PT Kereta Api Logistik. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada November 2025 sampai Mei 2026 dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara mendalam pada 22–28 April 2026 dengan tujuh narasumber, terdiri atas lima narasumber dari manajemen KAI Logistik, satu narasumber dari pesaing, dan satu narasumber dari pelanggan. Data sekunder diperoleh dari dokumen perusahaan, laporan kinerja, laporan tahunan, dan data industri.

Analisis dilakukan menggunakan PESTEL, Lima Kekuatan Porter, analisis sumber daya dan kapabilitas, VRIO, SWOT, serta TOWS. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa strategi yang paling relevan bagi PT Kereta Api Logistik adalah strategi diferensiasi terfokus berbasis layanan rel dan multimoda terintegrasi. Strategi ini diarahkan pada pelanggan korporasi, cargo owner, pabrikan, komoditas besar, B3, Limbah B3, project logistics, serta angkutan jarak menengah dan jauh yang membutuhkan layanan berkapasitas besar, aman, terjadwal, andal, dan terintegrasi.

 


This research was conducted at PT Kereta Api Logistik, a rail-based logistics company within the KAI Group ecosystem. This study examines the company’s competitive strategy in the national logistics transportation industry after its 2024 revenue and freight volume did not achieve the targets set in the Corporate Work Plan and Budget (RKAP). This condition was influenced by the dominance of road transportation, the development of digital logistics players, changing customer needs, the relocation of loading and unloading activities to competitors, declining demand for certain commodities, higher rail freight rental tariffs, limited service networks, and suboptimal asset utilization.

This study aims to identify external opportunities and threats, as well as internal strengths and weaknesses of PT Kereta Api Logistik. The research was conducted from November 2025 to May 2026 using a qualitative approach. Primary data were obtained through in-depth interviews conducted from April 22 to April 28, 2026, with seven respondents, consisting of five respondents from KAI Logistik management, one respondent from a competitor, and one respondent from a customer. Secondary data were obtained from company documents, performance reports, annual reports, and industry data.

The analysis used PESTEL, Porter’s Five Forces, resource and capability analysis, VRIO, SWOT, and TOWS. The results show that the most relevant strategy for PT Kereta Api Logistik is a focused differentiation strategy based on integrated rail and multimodal logistics services. This strategy is directed toward corporate customers, cargo owners, manufacturers, large-volume commodities, hazardous and toxic materials (B3), hazardous waste logistics, project logistics, and medium- to long-distance freight that requires high-capacity, safe, scheduled, reliable, and integrated services.

 


Kata Kunci : Kata kunci: Manajemen Strategi, Strategi Bersaing, PT Kereta Api Logistik, Industri Logistik, PESTEL, Lima Kekuatan Porter, VRIO, SWOT, TOWS

  1. S2-2026-551681-abstract.pdf  
  2. S2-2026-551681-bibliography.pdf  
  3. S2-2026-551681-tableofcontent.pdf  
  4. S2-2026-551681-title.pdf