PERAN PENGAWASAN INTERNAL DALAM MEMITIGASI RISIKO KREDIT: STUDI EMPIRIS PADA BANK UMUM DI INDONESIA
Sara Anggreina, I Wayan Nuka Lantara,M.Si.,Ph.D.
2026 | Tesis | S2 MANAJEMEN (MM) JAKARTA
Penelitian ini bertujuan menguji pengaruh pengawasan internal terhadap risiko kredit pada bank umum konvensional kategori KBMI 3 dan KBMI 4 di Indonesia periode 2020–2024. Pengawasan internal dalam studi ini diproksikan melalui Internal Control Quality Index (ICQI), proporsi komisaris independen, dan ukuran komite audit, sedangkan risiko kredit diukur dengan rasioNon-Performing Loan(NPL). Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan desain eksplanatori. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa data panel dari 100 observasi laporan tahunan dan laporan tata kelola bank yang diperoleh melalui metode purposive sampling. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan regresi data panel dengan model Fixed Effect yang diperkuat metode Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE).
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara simultan, indikator pengawasan internal dan variabel kontrol keuangan berpengaruh signifikan terhadap NPL. Secara parsial, proporsi komisaris independen berpengaruh negatif dan signifikan terhadap NPL, yang mengindikasikan bahwa pengawasan independen yang lebih kuat efektif menekan risiko kredit. Sebaliknya, ukuran komite audit berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap NPL, yang menunjukkan bahwa jumlah anggota yang lebih besar justru dapat menurunkan efektivitas pengawasan akibat kendala koordinasi. Sementara itu, ICQI berpengaruh negatif namun tidak signifikan pada tingkat kepercayaan 95%. Variabel kontrol BOPO, CAR, dan Sizeterbukti menjadi determinan penting bagi kualitas aset bank.
This study examines the effect of internal supervision on credit risk in Indonesian conventional commercial banks categorized as KBMI 3 and KBMI 4 over the 2020–2024 period. In this study, internal supervision is proxied by the Internal Control Quality Index (ICQI), the proportion of independent commissioners, and the size of the audit committee, while credit risk is measured by the Non-Performing Loan (NPL) ratio. This research adopts a quantitative approach with an explanatory design. The data used are secondary panel data from 100 observations of annual reports and good corporate governance reports, obtained through purposive sampling. The analysis was conducted using panel data regression with a Fixed Effect model, enhanced by the Panel-Corrected Standard Errors (PCSE) method.
The results show that internal supervision indicators and financial control variables simultaneously have a significant effect on NPL. Partially, the proportion of independent commissioners has a significant negative effect on NPL, indicating that stronger independent oversight effectively reduces credit risk. Conversely, the size of the audit committee has a significant positive effect on NPL, suggesting that a larger number of members might decrease supervisory effectiveness due to coordination challenges. Meanwhile, ICQI shows a negative but insignificant effect at the 95% confidence level. The control variables BOPO, CAR, and Size are proven to be important determinants of bank asset quality.
Kata Kunci : Internal Supervision, Credit Risk, NPL, ICQI, Independent Commissioner, Audit Committee