Cost Effectiveness Of Analysis Antibiotik Ceftriaxone-Metronidazole dan Ampisilin Sulbaktam Pada Pasien Infeksi Ulkus Kaki Diabetikum Rawat Inap di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta
Alfita Rahmawati, Prof. Dr. apt. Tri Murti Andayani, Sp. FRS; Dr. apt. Nanang Munif Yasin, M.Pharm
2025 | Tesis | S2 Mag.Farmasi Klinik
Ceftriaxone-Metronidazole dan ampisilin-sulbaktam merupakan
kombinasi terapi antibiotik empiris yang umum digunakan pada penanganan pasien
rawat inap infeksi ulkus kaki diabetikum kategori moderate-severe serta aktif
terhadap bakteri gram negatif, positif maupun anaerob. Penggunaan kedua terapi
antibiotik ini memiliki perbedaan regimen dan efektifitas sehingga perlu
diperhatikan tidak hanya dari efektifitas namun juga dari sisi farmakoekonomi.
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah analisis efektifitas biaya penggunaan
ceftriaxone-metronidazole dan ampisillin-sulbaktam sebagai antibiotik empiris
yang diresepkan pada pasien ulkus kaki diabetikum rawat inap. Desain penelitian
ini adalah kohort retrospektif menggunakan data rekam medis serta data biaya
medis di RSUP Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta pada periode 2021 2024. Efektifitas
klinis infeksi pada pasien dinyatakan dengan terdapat perbaikan tanda vital dan
klinis, parameter laboratorium serta tidak terjadi eskalasi antibiotik atau
antibiotik tambahan. Analisis biaya dilakukan dengan menghitung total biaya
medis langsung. Penentuan terapi cost effective menggunakan nilai average cost
effectiveness ratio (ACER) dan incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) dari
kedua kelompok. Subjek pada penelitian ini yaitu 23 orang kelompok ceftriaxone
metronidazole dan 43 orang kelompok ampisilin-sulbaktam. Terdapat perbedaan
signifikan perbaikan efektifitas klinis pada kelompok ceftriaxone-metronidazole
dan ampisilin-sulbaktam yaitu 82,6?n 48,8% (p=0,009). Pada total biaya medis
langsung terdapat perbedaan signifikan antara ceftriaxone-metronidazole dan
ampisilin sulbaktam yaitu Rp 17.866.114 per episode rawat inap (3-7 hari) dan
Rp 13.890.030 per episode rawat inap (3-7 hari) (p=0,005). Pada perhitungan
nilai ICER dapat disimpulkan bahwa untuk meningkatkan 1?ektifitas klinis
infeksi diabetikum pada pasien ceftriaxone metronidazole membutuhkan tambahan
biaya tambahan sebesar Rp 117.635.
Ceftriaxone-Metronidazole and ampicillin-sulbactam are a
combination of empirical antibiotic therapy that is commonly used in the
treatment of inpatients with moderate-severe diabetic foot ulcer infections and
is active against gram negative, gram-positive, and anaerobic bacteria. The use
of these two antibiotic therapies has different regimens and effectiveness, so
it is necessary to consider not only effectiveness but also from
pharmacoeconomic aspects. This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of
using ceftriaxone-metronidazole and ampicillin sulbactam as empirical
antibiotics prescribed to inpatients with diabetic foot ulcers. This study
design is a retrospective cohort using medical record data and medical cost
data at Dr. Sardjito General Hospital, Yogyakarta, in the period 2021 2024. The
clinical effectiveness of infection in patients is that there is improvement in
vital and clinical signs, laboratory parameters and there is no escalation of
antibiotics or additional antibiotics. Cost analysis was performed by
calculating total direct medical costs. The cost-effectiveness of therapy was
determined using the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) and incremental
cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) values for both groups. Subjects in this study
were 23 people in the ceftriaxone-metronidazole group and 43 people in the
ampicillin-sulbactam group. There was a significant difference in clinical
effectiveness improvement in the ceftriaxone-metronidazole and
ampicillin-sulbactam groups, namely 82,6% and 48,8% (p=0,009). In total direct
medical costs, there was a significant difference between
ceftriaxone-metronidazole and ampicillin-sulbactam, namely Rp 17.866.114 per
inpatient episode (3-7 days) and Rp 13.890.030 per inpatient episode (3-7 days)
(p=0,005). In the ICER value calculation, it can be concluded that to increase
the clinical effectiveness of diabetic infections in ceftriaxone metronidazole
patients by 1% requires an additional cost of Rp 117.635.
Kata Kunci : Cost effectiveness analysis, Ceftriaxone-Metronidazole, Ampisillin-Sulbaktam, Efektivitas, Efek samping