Deteksi Enterobacteriaceae Penghasil AMPC Beta-Laktamase: Kesesuaian Metode AMPC Disk Test Menggunakan Larutan Penyangga Tris-Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) dan Larutan Penyangga Asam Fenil Boronat
Nurul Fitriya, Prof. Dr. dr. Osman Sianipar, DMM, M.Sc., Sp.PK., Subsp P.I. (K), Subsp. Onk. (K); Dr. dr. Usi Sukorini, M.Kes., Sp.PK, Subsp. H.K. (K), Subsp. B.D.K.T. (K)
2025 | Tesis-Spesialis | S2 Ilmu Patologi Klinik
Latar Belakang: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, dan Proteus mirabilis merupakan anggota famili Enterobacteriaceae yang dapat memproduksi AmpC beta-laktamase. Bakteri penghasil AmpC beta-laktamase dapat menyebabkan kegagalan terapi karena bakteri penghasil enzim ini tidak dapat dihambat pertumbuhannya oleh inhibitor beta laktamase. Deteksi bakteri penghasil enzim ini penting dilakukan supaya pemilihan antimikrobia untuk mengatasi infeksinya semakin tepat. Deteksi tersebut dapat dilakukan dengan metode AmpC disk test menggunakan asam fenil boronat sebagai larutan penyangga, akan tetapi memiliki keterbatasan persediaan, sehingga diperlukan metode lain yang menggunakan larutan penyangga Tris- Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid yang lebih mudah didapatkan.
Background: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Proteus mirabilis are members of the Enterobacteriaceae family that can produce AmpC beta-lactamase. AmpC beta-lactamase-producing bacteria can cause therapy failure because the bacteria producing this enzyme cannot be inhibited by beta-lactamase inhibitors. Detection of bacteria producing this enzyme is important so that the selection of antimicrobials to treat the infection is more appropriate. This detection can be done using phenyl boronic acid as a buffer solution, but it has limited supplies, so another method is needed that uses AmpC disk test Tris-Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid buffer solution which is more easily obtained
Objective: To evaluate the suitability and comparison of the detection level of Enterobacteriaceae producing AmpC beta-lactamase method Tris-Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid buffer solution compared to phenyl boronic acid buffer solution.
Method: This study was an observational study with a cross-sectional design involving clinical isolates of E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and P. mirabilis (monomicrobial). All clinical isolates were subjected to the AmpC disk test using Tris-Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid buffer solution, and phenyl boronic acid buffer solution. The agreement between the two methods was analyzed using a 2x2 table and displayed in the Kappa index.
Result: A total of 181 subjects were examined bacterial culture identified as E. coli 83 isolates (45.86%), K. pneumonia 65 isolates (35.91%), and P. mirabilis 33 isolates (18.23%). Comparison of detection level of AmpC beta-lactamase with Tris-EDTA buffer solution (41.43%) was higher significantly from phenyl boronic acid (30.39%) (p value = 0.03). The agreement of the results of AmpC beta-lactamase detection between AmpC disk test Tris-EDTA buffer solution and phenyl boronic acid was 76.8% with a Kappa index of 0.51 (p = <0>
Conclusion: The suitability of AmpC beta-lactamase detection using method AmpC disk test Tris-EDTA buffer solution and phenyl boronic acid buffer solution is weak.
Kata Kunci : Enterobacteriaceae, AmpC beta-laktamase, AmpC disk test Tris-Ethylendiaminetetraacetic acid, deteksi AmpC beta-laktamase metode asam fenil boronat, indeks Kappa