Validitas Kriteria dan Diskriminan Sensitivity to Expected Utility-Situational Judgment Test

FINI T. NUBAN TIMO, Rahmat Hidayat, S.Psi., M.A., Ph.D

2020 | Tesis | MAGISTER PSIKOLOGI

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji validitas eksternal alat ukur Sensitivity to Expected Utility-Situational Judgment Test (SEU-SJT). Validitas eksternal dilakukan dengan menegakkan validitas kriteria dan diskriminan dari SEU-SJT. Kriteria validitas SEU-SJT dalam penelitian ini adalah resistance to framing, resistance to sunk cost, cognitive miserly/Reflection vs Intuition, dan Potensi Akademik Pascasarjana (PAPS), sedangkan validitas diskriminan diuji dengan mengkorelasikan SEU-SJT dengan conscientiousness. Hasil pengujian menunjukkan bahwa instrumen SEU-SJT menunjukkan data yang valid untuk mengukur kemampuan individu untuk memilih opsi dengan utilitas terbesar berdasarkan kriteria cognitive miserly/Reflection vs Intuition; dan diskriminan conscientiousness.

This study aims to examine the external validity of the Sensitivity to Expected Utility-Situational Judgment Test (SEU-SJT). External validity is done by upholding the criterion validity and discrimination validity of the SEU-SJT. SEU-SJT criteria in this research are resistance to framing, resistance to sunk cost, cognitive miserly/Reflection vs Intuition, and Potensi Akademik Pascasarjana (PAPS) test, while discriminant validity is tested by correlating SEU-SJT with conscientiousness. The test results show that the SEU-SJT instrument shows valid data to measure the ability of individuals to choose the option with the greatest utility based on cognitive miserly/Reflection vs Intuition criteria; and discriminant conscientiousness.

Kata Kunci : validitas kriteria, validitas diskriminan, sensitivity to expected utility