Capital Punishment Sentencing in Narcotic Cases

DJERI OKTAFYAN W, Muhammad Fatahillah Akbar, S.H., LL.M.

2018 | Skripsi | S1 HUKUM

Skripsi ini ditujukan untuk mengetahui lebih baik pertimbangan hakim dalam menjatuhkan pidana mati dalam tindak pidana narkotika dan memberikan gambaran tentang pengaruh teori pemidanaan dan hubungannya terhadap penjatuhan pidana mati. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan untuk menganlisa pendekatan seorang hakim dan pengaruh teori pemidanaan yang menghasilkan putusan yang berbeda. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan melalui penelitian hukum normatif, data untuk penelitian hukum ini telah digabungkan menjadi sebuah studi literatur dalam bentuk buku, jurnal, artikel dan sumber lainnya yang menyangkut pendekatan hakim, tindak pidana narkotika dan teori pemidanaan. Analisa dari penulisan hukum ini di dasarkan oleh pendekatan hakim dalam putusan no. 92/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Lsk, 37/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Sak, 358/Pid.B/ 2010/PN.Slmn. 1360K/Pid.Sus/2016 dimana di dalam kasus-kasus tersebut, para terdakwa di ancam pidana mati baik di tuntut maupun di pidana mati. Perbedaan dari putusan tersebut di dasarkan oleh pendekatan hakim dan teori pemidanaan di dalam ratio decidendi yang menyebabkan Terdakwa di pidana mati atau tidak.

This legal research aims to seek a better understanding the considerations of the judges in determining capital punishment sentencing in narcotic cases and to give insight the relevance of punishment theory towards the capital punishment sentencing. It is well known that there are several approaches of a judge in considering cases and also several punishment theories exist in the criminal law. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the approach of a judge and the relevance of punishment theories which resulting different decisions. This legal research conducted through a normative legal research, the data for the research is collected from literary studies in a form of books, journals, articles and other sources regarding approach of the judges, narcotic offense and punishment theory. The analysis of this research heavily based on the approaches of the judges in the decision no. 92/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Lsk, 37/Pid.Sus/2015/PN.Sak, 358/Pid.B/ 2010/PN.Slmn. 1360K/Pid.Sus/2016 in which in these cases, the defendants were facing capital punishment sentencing whether they were charged with capital punishment or they were given capital punishment sentence by the judges. The results are different because the judges in these four decisions use different approach and punishment theory in the ratio decidendi which lead to the capital punishment sentencing or non-capital punishment sentencing.

Kata Kunci : Narcotic Offense, Capital Punishment, Approach of the Judges, Punishment Theory