Anatomi Konflik Kebijakan Penambangan Pasir Besi di Pesisir Selatan Kabupaten Kulon Progo
Swatyasti Primastuti, Abdul Gaffar Karim
2015 | Skripsi | Politik dan Pemerintahan (dh. Ilmu Pemerintahan)ABSTRACTION Policy is a product issued by the government. Pros and cons in a public policy is a natural thing. From the pros and cons that arise in the community, then allows for the emergence of a conflict. Conflicts that arise in a policy are interesting to study, to determine the factors that becoming the trigger of conflict on a policy, as well as the actors whose involved in it. Iron sand mining policy is a policy that reaped the conflict. There are differences between the government and the public interest. On the one hand, the government wants to utilize coastal land as a mining project. While people want to keep coastal land as an agricultural land. This is led to a feud between the government and the community for many years. Behind these case, it turns out a few years earlier, there has been a conflict in Kulon Progo’s coastal land. At that time, the government also make a policy that cause a conflict, namely the building of Ring I transmigration area in the coastal area, precisely in the Karangsewu village. Thus, it can be seen that in the coastal area and by its people, it has had a genetic conflict. In the case of iron sand mining policy conflict, people who reject the policy formed a group, named Paguyuban Petani Lahan Pantai (PPLP). PPLP balked these iron sands mining project. Over the years, the government tried to approach this group. Various ways have been done by the government. In addition to the group approached the counter, the government has also approached the pro group. This research uses qualitative case study method. Data collected by interviews and non-participant observation for primary data and by tracking documents or supporting literature to obtain secondary data. Both of these data are used for cross-clicking so that the results are valid. This study found that the iron sand mining policy conflicts occured because of differences in perception between the government and the public on land management. In this case, the government is trying to "force" people, while people are trying to fight the government. Two different poles are raises vertical conflict, between the government and society. In the process, the dynamics of conflict occurs when the government attempted to manage the pros and cons that exist in society. The Government has not used democratic way to manage the pros and cons in the community. The existence of violence either physical or non-physical done by the government to dampen the sound of the counter to the policy community. In doing terror and intimidation, the government does not intervene alone, but involves other actors such as the bureaucracy and the actors of the investors. Meanwhile, for a group of pro-government try to approach to providing information in socializations. The implication that arises is the emergence of a wider conflict, the conflict between the community that pro to the policy with the community that counter to the policy. Key words: public policy, pros and cons, conflict, iron sand, mining, Kulon Progo
Kata Kunci : Konflik