Celah Rawan Pengelolaan Dana Hibah:(Studi kasus Pengelolaan Bantuan Dana Hibah Bidang Pertanian APBD Provinsi Jawa Tengah Tahun Anggaran 2013 untuk Kelompok Ternak di Kabupaten Magelang)

Jefri Adriansyah, Wahyudi Kumorotomo

2015 | Skripsi | Manajemen dan Kebijakan Publik (dh. Ilmu Administrasi Negara)

ABSTRACT Grants Policy Agriculture is a policy that is very insecure to various abuses. This is not true regardless of the budget became seizure by various parties, both political parties, members of the board, executive and young people themselves. Moreover, in 2013 and 2014 in Magelang district, Central Java faced with the political events such as the election of Regent Magelang, Central Java Governor Election, Elections Legislative and Presidential Elections. So the presence of Agriculture Grant in 2013 is a condition that is very casuistic because faced with the various political interests. Public budgets are present not just as a managerial document, but also a political space by various actors. Based on the problem of this research is more focused on vulnerable gap that occurs in the management of the Agricultural Sector Grant in 2013. The purpose of this research is to explain the process of formulating the budget Grant Agriculture in Central Java provincial budget 2013, then interest, involvement and the role of actors in the formulation of the budget that occur therein. Explain the mechanisms associated with the management of the Agricultural Sector Grant in Central Java provincial budget 2013 for livestock groups in Magelang district and vulnerability gap that occurs and what lies behind these vulnerabilities arise. The approach used in this study is a qualitative approach using case study. There are two types of data are used, namely primary and secondary data obtained from the results of in-depth interviews, observation and planning documents and financial management. The results of this study indicate that Grant Agriculture in 2013 actually not had a positive impact on the achievement of development goals in order solidified RKPD food security in Central Java Province in 2013. This is due to a crack-prone emerging from the formulation to the monitoring and evaluation of policies. The existence of Paragraph (ayat) 3 and 5 in Article (pasal) 20 of Law No. 17 of 2003 on State Finance raises more powers to the Parliament to intervene in micro budget policy. In Grant Agriculture in 2013 also led to the existence of the pork barrel and clientalism. Limitations quantity of resources owned Production Development Bureau (Biro Bina Produksi) at least result in the management of the Agricultural Sector Grant walked less than optimal. Monitoring and evaluation conducted by the Bureau of Production Development (Biro Bina Produksi), the inspectorate and Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan) are also not able to be firm against and minimize abuses mode by livestock groups. As for suggestions from researchers that (1) the judicial review of Article (pasal) 20 Paragraph (ayat) 3 and 5 of Law No. 17 of 2003 on State Finances; (2) There should be rules or policies of the center related to the maximum limit of the grant expenditure allocations in the budget structure; (3) Perform tightening requirements for livestock groups who want to propose Grant Agriculture; and (4) Conducting intensive coordination between the Bureau of Production Development (Biro Bina Produksi), Inspectorate, Audit Board of the Republic of Indonesia (Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan), Technical Department at the District / Municipal and Agricultural Extension Workers in development efforts as well as monitoring and evaluation of policies Agriculture Grant Central Java Provincial budget. Keywords: grants, crack-prone, political budget, clientelism, pork barrel politics.

Kata Kunci : Politik Anggaran