Pengaruh Status Kepegawaian, Insentif, dan Lingkungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Pegawai di Program Studi S2 Ilmu Kesehatan Masyarakat Fakultas Kedokteran UGM Yogyakarta

Maryami Nuryati, Bevaola Kusumasari

2015 | Tesis | S2 Magister Administrasi Publik

ABSTRACT Background : Condition university environment continue to change and full of challenges the change. University Environmental, do not again just expect the quality but more than the university environment was expecting the satisfaction of fulfillment of the various services provided higher education. To respond these changes, the increase employee of performance should be done by reference to the a vision, mission and organizational strategy. An internal challenges still faced by S2 Study Program in Public Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine UGM is lack of spirit of and lack of responsibility of employees in the worked, and then its impact employee performance is not yet optimal. Purpose: Order to know the effect of employment status, incentive and in partial work environment and simultaneously to the performance employee in S2 Study Program in Public Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine UGM Yogyakarta. Research Methodology: Research type was survey of of research with quantitative of research the approach. Subjects of this study were employees S2 Studies Graduate Program in Public Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine UGM. The number of sample in this study were 50 respondents. The object of the this study was employment status, incentive, work environment and performance of employees. Data analysis was done contain: multiple regression (Multiple Regrassion), F test is done to determine the significance of the influence variables X1, X2 and X3 collectively or simultaneously to variable Y; T-test conducted to determine the effect of each variable X1, X2 and X3 to variable Y. Research Result: Regression analysis adjusted values, R2 = 0.389 or 38.9%shows that the variation performance of employees (Y) which can described variable employee status, incentive and work environment of 38.9%. While the remaining 61.1% influenced by other factors. The calculated F value is 11.411. With the significant value of 0.000, and the value of the Ftable (0.05: 3; 40) is 2.84. Thus we can conclude that it F-count> F-table with a significant level of 0.000 <0.05 (p <0.05), so Ho rejected and Ha accepted, meaning that employment status variables, incentive and work environment simultaneously affect to the performance employee. T-count employee status variables, t count is smaller than t-table (1.697 <2.021) with probability (0.096) greater than the significance level of 0.05, thus Ho is accepted, and Ha rejected, it means employment status variables has an effect positive and not significant to employee performance; Variable incentive t-count is greater than t-table (2.130> 2.021) with probability (0.039) is smaller than the significance level of 0.05, thus Ho is rejected and Ha accepted, meaning that the variable incentives have a positive and significant influence to employee performance. work environment variable t count, larger than t-table (2.960> 2.021) with probability (0.005) is smaller than the significance level of 0.05, thus Ho is rejected and Ha accepted, it means work environment variable has a positive and significant influence to employee performance. Sifnifikan value in the t test, the most dominant variable is the variable work environment with significant value of 0.005, because the significant value in work environment variable has the smallest value when compared with other variables. So it can be concluded that the variables that have the greatest influence on the performance of employee is work environment. Conclusion: Employment status, incentive and work environment simultaneously affects the performance of employees; Employment status but not significant positive effect on employee performance; Incentives and work environment positive and significant impact on employee performance; Working environment and significant positive effect on employee performance; The work environment has the most dominant effect on employee performance study program S2 IKM Faculty of Medicine UGM; Variation employee performance (Y) which can be described variable employment status, incentive and work environment of 38.9%. While the rest 61.1% influenced by other factors. Keywords: employment status, incentive, work environment, performance

Kata Kunci : Kinerja Pegawai