PENERAPAN PASAL 11 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMER 5. TAHUN 1999 TENTANG LARANGAN MONOPOLI DAN PRAKTIK PERSAINGAN USAHA TIDAK SEHAT PADA DUA PUTUSAN KPPU (STUDI KASUS PERKARA NOMOR: 10/KPPU-L/2005 DAN 03/KPPU-I/2003)

ABDURRAHIM, Prof. Dr. Sulistiowati, SH., M.Hum.

2017 | Tesis | S2 Hukum

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penerapan Pasal 11 Undang-Undang 5 Tahun 1999 Tentang Larangan Prektek Monopoli Dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Dalam putusan kartel garam dan kartel kargo surabaya-makassar dan meneliti perbedaan penerapan pada putusan yang ditemukan adanya kolusi secara diam-diam dan kolusi eksplisit dan untuk menganalisis peran dan kedudukan analisis ekonomi dalam pembuktian kartel garam, ditinjau dari segi hukum pembuktian Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktek Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian yuridis normatif. Data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari data primer dan data sekunder. Data primer didapatkan dari studi literatur mengenai peraturan perundangan terkait. Sedangkan data sekunder didapatkan dari penelitian literatur mengenai berbagai macam penjelasan yang terikat dengan data primer. Hasil dari penelitian dianalisis secara deskriptip kualitatif dn penyajian penelitian dlakukan secara deskriptif. Hasil dari penelitian ini dalam penerapan Pasal 11 Undang-Undang No. Tahun 1999 adalah pada kasus yang tidak ditemukan adanya perjanjian secara tertulis dibutuhkan pembuktian secara analisis ekonomi atau indirect evidence dalam pembuktiannya. Sedangkan dalam peran dankedudukanna dalam Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 1999, analisis ekonomi dapat dijadikan sebagai alat bukti petunjuk untuk mengungkap terjadinya suatu kolusi dalam suatu persaingan usaha.

The purpose of this research was to find the implementation of article 11 of the Law no 5/1999 about the prohibition of monopolistic practice and unfair business competition in several KPPU's decision (case no 10/KPPU-L/2005 and 03/KPPU-I/2003) and to analize the matters which concerned in determining the existence of cartel in unfair business competition. This research using normative juridical as the method. The data which used in this research contain primary and secondary data. The primary data was got from literature study about related laws. And the secondary data was got from literature's research about any related explanation of primary data. The result of this research was analized by qualitative descriptive and presented by descriptive method. The result of this research in the implementation of article 11 of Law no. 5/1999 about the prohibition of monopolistic practice and unfair business competition, KPPU in determining an activity which belongs to the cartel category as ruled in article 11 of law no. 5/1999, firstly they will find the facts relating to the factors in the article 11 of law no. 5/1999. In determining a cartel, KPPU explained the indicators which become of concern, then an business competition action could be categorized as a cartel. Keyword: cartel, monopoly, business competition The purpose of this research was to find the implementation of article 11 of the Law no 5/1999 about the prohibition of monopolistic practice and unfair business competition in several KPPU's decision (case no 10/KPPU-L/2005 and 03/KPPU-I/2003) and to analize the matters which concerned in determining the existence of cartel in unfair business competition. This research using normative juridical as the method. The data which used in this research contain primary and secondary data. The primary data was got from literature study about related laws. And the secondary data was got from literature's research about any related explanation of primary data. The result of this research was analized by qualitative descriptive and presented by descriptive method. The result of this research in the implementation of article 11 of Law no. 5/1999 about the prohibition of monopolistic practice and unfair business competition, KPPU in determining an activity which belongs to the cartel category as ruled in article 11 of law no. 5/1999, firstly they will find the facts relating to the factors in the article 11 of law no. 5/1999. In determining a cartel, KPPU explained the indicators which become of concern, then an business competition action could be categorized as a cartel.

Kata Kunci : kartel, monopoli, persaingan usaha,cartel, monopoly, business competition